 |

NEWS
Rape survivor raped
by 3 police officers wins case (front
page of The Star, Johannesburg)
Rape victim pleased with court ruling
June 13 2005 at 02:07PM
By Jenni Evans
The Constitutional Court ruling on Monday that the minister of safety
and security was liable for the rape of a woman by three policemen was
"extremely positive", the attorney for the rape victim said on Monday.
"It is an extremely positive judgment. She is extremely happy with the
outcome of the Constitutional Court case," Hayley Galgut of the Women's
Legal Centre said on behalf of the woman.
In March 1999 the woman had a fight with her boyfriend at a club in the
early hours of the morning and, because the club did not have a
telephone available, she went to a petrol station to phone her mother to
ask her to fetch her.
An on-duty uniformed policeman who had stopped to buy a cold drink,
heard of her plight and offered to take her home. She got into the
police vehicle where another two policemen, also in uniform and on duty,
were waiting.
On the way, the three sergeants - Nathaniel Rammutle, Ephraim
Gabaatlholwe and Edwin Nqandela - turned in the wrong direction and when
she pointed this out, a policeman's jacket was thrown over her head and
held tight. When she resisted and asked them to remove it, they pulled
it tighter so that she could hardly breathe.
She was punched in the stomach and told to be quiet. They stopped the
police vehicle, took off her jeans, underwear, shoes and socks, and each
raped her while she tried to fight them off. They then put some of her
clothes back on, helped her out of the car, removed the jacket and sped
off.
All three policemen were sentenced to life imprisonment for rape and 10
years' imprisonment for kidnapping. They are still serving their
sentences.
The woman, who may not be named because she is the victim of a sex
crime, unsuccessfully sought R515 000 in damages from the minister of
safety and security in the Johannesburg High Court and Supreme Court of
Appeal.
She did not pursue a case against the policemen as they were in prison
and would be unlikely to pay damages.
The other two courts found that the actions of the police officers fell
outside the course and scope of their employment and that consequently
the minister could not be held vicariously liable for their conduct.
The Constitutional Court was told by the advocate for the safety and
security ministry that because it is not part of a policeman's duty to
rape, they could not be held liable.
They said the woman was not in danger or in distress at the time she was
offered a lift, she was not under arrest and that the policemen's
contract with her was merely one of transport. The policemen had also
broken an internal rule by giving her a lift.
But the Constitutional Court found that although the woman was at risk,
and although the policemen's conduct was a clear deviation from their
duty, there was a sufficiently close relationship between their
employment and the wrongful conduct.
The policemen bore a statutory and constitutional duty to prevent crime
and protect the members of the public; a duty which also rested on their
employer.
"One of the purposes of wearing uniforms is to make police officers more
identifiable to members of the public who find themselves in need of
assistance," the judgment said.
"There is an intimate connection between the delict committed by the
policemen and the purposes of their employer. This close connection
renders the respondent (the minister) liable vicariously to the
applicant for the wrongful conduct of the policemen."
In handing down judgment, O'Regan said: "It is important that members of
the public trust the police."
Asked for comment, ministry of safety and security spokesperson Trevor
Bloem said: "We won't have any comment on that until we have studied the
judgment."
The case, which is expected to have future bearing on methods of
establishing liability and vicarious liability, will return to the
Johannesburg High Court to determine the amount of damages the woman is
entitled to.
The minister was also ordered to pay all legal costs the woman incurred
during the case. - Sapa
©
Speak Out Terms of use
|